« Political Kiss of Death | Main | Pull My Solar Finger »
October 30, 2003
Today's Rabid Rant
Today's Rabid Rant is brought to us by Paul Craig Roberts of the Washington Times and the letter N. He's a little upset at the Pentagon's look at developing "mini-nukes".
This extraordinary proposal from the world's arms-control hegemon demonstrates the fanaticism of the neoconservatives. They are indeed the heirs of the French Revolution just as professor Claes Ryn shows in his new book, "America the Virtuous."
Isn't "neocon" the latest buzzword for the Joos? Or am I misinformed? Whomever he is referring to, it's pretty low to compare them to the "heirs of the French Revolution" cuz like......didn't those people end up turning on each other & destroying themselves kinda like the Democratic party has been doing lately?
The Pentagon report, which has been leaked to a defense magazine, designates "terrorists" as the targets of the mini-nukes. New nuclear weapons are said to be necessary in order to destroy deeply buried biological weapons caches, terrorist cells and hidden weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
In the case of bio and other WMD's, how else would one destroy them? Send in the world's largest HAZMAT team? Yeah, that'd be effective.
Deeply buried caches of weapons of mass destruction exist nowhere except, of course, in the United States, Israel and Russia — countries that are not to be found on the neoconservatives' terrorist list. But neoconservatives are betting that a rumored threat can be used to justify a new generation of nuclear weapons.
Oh yeah, I forgot. They don't exist in Iraq because no one's seen them yet. Except the Kurds. But they don't count because that was just a tribal thing, and Saddam just abandoned that little effective chemical warfare weapon because after all, they weren't used in the Iraq war. Evil dictators do that, you know. They develop things that will kill thousands of people with one hit and then just toss them aside. Right.
The only purpose of the "small nuclear weapons" — an oxymoron if ever there was one — is to incinerate Muslim cities. Just as Iraq, Iran and Syria are declared, propagandistically, to be "terrorist states," Damascus, Tehran, Baghdad, Mecca, Cairo and Mogadishu would be declared "terrorist cities." It looks as if the neoconservatives intend a final solution to their "Muslim problem" and are organizing genocide for Arabs.
He says that like it was a bad thing. But seriously, if we had lobbed a few mini-nukes into the caves at Bora-Bora, you think we would still be getting releases of Usama's latest hits collections or the new Jihadists' Gone Wild (Now With More Camel Humping!)? Because the only effective way to stop terrorists is to like, you know, kill them first.
Not satisfied with their revolutionary destruction of world order, neoconservatives now demand that the United States lead the world in a new round of nuclear proliferation.
If this is not the behavior of a rogue state, what is?
Ooo, ooo, I know the answer to that one. What is sending people covered with strap-on bombs to blow themselves up, thereby murdering innocent civilian bystanders? Yeah, yeah. Amerikka bad, Palestine good. Now there's an original and highly logical position.
The Pentagon report argues for a new generation of useable nuclear weapons on the bare assumption that terrorist underground caches of WMD will materialize out of thin air sometime in the future. The Pentagon report does not explain why terrorists who intend us harm would make targets of their WMD by storing them in bunkers instead of immediately using them against us.
Here's a thought. Perhaps they're storing them until.....say....they get a chance to use them in a big way.
In three short years, neoconservatives have reorganized the Department of Defense from a deterrent force to a means of waging aggressive war.
And a damn fine job they've done too....one that's allowed Mr. Roberts to sit in the safety of his office writing anti-Amerikkan screeds instead of hiding in a bunker under a destroyed D.C.
It shows that U.S. policy, following that of Israel's Ariel Sharon, has abandoned the quest for peace in the Middle East, focusing instead on a one-sided resolution through conquest.
Damn those Joos! If they're gonna run the world, they should do a better job. After all, that "quest for peace" has worked so well in the past. I can't imagine why it would be "abandoned" by those who are actually getting killed.
Deceived, befuddled and complicit, Americans are being led into a wider war.
If we weren't all too stupid, we would see what's really happening. Good thing we have the superior intellects of those like Mr. Roberts to explain it to us.
Now if he'd just explain why the Joos are running things if he and his ilk are so much more intelligent than everyone else.
[/sarcasm]
Posted by Rita at October 30, 2003 06:31 AM